# Satellite projections is out dated, refer to the sub-page --- # Null Hypothesis for Flat Earth Notes: <font color="#ff0000">RE: Using the sky to prove the shape of the ground: </font> <font color="#ff0000">You can't use to to tell you what the shape is, but you can use it to tell you what the shape isn't.</font> The null hypothesis (H₀) is assumed to be true. You try to find evidence against it so that the null hypothesis may be rejected in favor of an alternative hypothesis (H₁). H₁ is a competing hypothesis that's offers a mutually exclusive explanation from the null hypothesis. Because H₀ and H₁ are mutually exclusive, they both cannot be true. You cannot prove your null hypothesis. However, you can fail to falsify it. Failing to reject the null indicates that the data did not provide sufficient enough evidence to falsify it. Similarly to proving a negative. Two competing hypothesis: H₀: Unicorns don't exist H₁: Unicorns exist Mutually exclusive claims that can't simultaneously be true. If you cannot falsify the null, it doesn't mean unicorns don't exist, it means you failed to provide evidence that they exist. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-noncontradiction/ --- ## H₀: The Earth is planar and measurements of curvature are dependent on the position of celestial bodies. Notes: => Planar => Curvature = optical Evidence of planar will be independent of the position of celestial bodies. --- ## H₁: The Earth is globular and measurable curvature independent of celestial bodies. Notes: => Globular => Curvature = physical Earth curvature != optical curvature: - Earth curvature has to produce optical effects - Optical effects can't produce physical earth curvature ( #BotB ) --- <iframe height="720" width="1280" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/m2sgWUNWKqE?autoplay=0"> </iframe> Notes: What does this map represent? Positions of the stars. --- ![[20241224-3.png]] Notes: Graticule / which is correction / what works on a globe / Any mutually exclusive evidence Which projection is correction: AE or Globular https://publish.obsidian.md/shanesql/Maps+and+the+Coordinate+Systems+they+are+Projected+From --- ![[20241224-4.png]] Notes: This coordinate system is said to represent Earth's curvature and corresponding ground locations to stars with respect to their zenith. --- Units of measurement derived are a fraction of the coordinate system --- # Perspective: Hyperbolic vs Euclidean --- Notes: - Optical curvature vs physical --- ![[perspective.png]] Notes: --- ![[image.png]] Note: RAS Explanation i.e. telescopes and 180° opposite observations --- ![[20240213-3.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241223-1.png]] Notes: Proctor, R.A., and A.C. Ranyard. _Old and New Astronomy_. Longmans, Green and Company, 1892. [https://books.google.com/books?id=KS8_AAAAYAAJ](https://books.google.com/books?id=KS8_AAAAYAAJ). --- ![[20240217-9.png]] Note: SE vs Optical SE Next slide - SE --- ![[20240217-10.png]] Note: Google Earth --- ![[20240217-12.png]] Note: Not to scale Physical angular excess as Earth curvature over great distances. Using the angular excess of 0.00507 km/s^-2 when applying Gauss theorem gives an radius of 6378 km (3959 mi) Arc of the Parallel, etc Found no spherical excess --- ![[20241224-1.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241224-2.png]] Notes: https://web.archive.org/web/20220128205422/https://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/watchtheskies/20jun_moonillusion.html --- Sun beam to observer at beach --- Moon beam Notes: apparent just for you You're not looking at the same object --- # Measurements of Curvature --- Notes: **ASTRO**-Geodetic surveying All measurements in reference to the shape of the Earth come from elevation angles to celestial objects in the sky Examining the history of Astro-geodetic surveying, surveying, Nautical Almanac, and arc of the parallel Corrections to the stars come in the form of unfalsifiable assumptions (oblate spheroid, gravitational potential anomaly, multi refraction coefficients that make any observation equivalent to a planar observation). Any measurement that isn't using an external reference (the stars) is begging the question by assuming the cause for optical drop is physical Earth curvature. <font color="#ff0000">No measurement of Earth's curvature exist without reference to position of the stars (geodetic surveying). In accordance with Earth's assumed radius, the angular excess in an equilateral triangle with sides of 1 km is 0.002 arcseconds.</font> Locally, the Earth is FLAT --- ![[20241219-29.png]] Notes: - <font color="#ff0000">Needs exact values for accuracy</font> - Distances, units of measurement, locations are derived from ratios of the radius which is based off elevation angles to Polaris --- ![[20241219-42.png]] Notes: True position or not; they need the exactness for ref Arago and Airy's experiment on the affects of a refractive medium on starlight --- ![[Arago_1.png]] Notes: No velocity change in the stars with respect to Earth's change in position going with and against the sun Conclusion: the Earth is at rest Fresnel, A. (1818), "Letter from M. [Fresnel] to M. Arago on the influence of the Earth's motion in some optical phenomena", Annals of Chemistry and Physics, 9: 57-66 (Sep. 1818), 286-7 (Nov. 1818); Arago's focal adjustments Mandatory in helio or geo for physical stars -> has to be a change in relative distance -> No adjustment needed => There's no relative distance change! => stars perceived in a equidistant web => Celestial distances (planets) are a ratio of their periodicity, stars distance as a function of luminous magnitude (apparent vs absolute lol); => Terrestrial distances <font color="#ff0000">distances in the sky have no physical meaning; only when they're translated to the ground using the law of cosines with respect to the elevation angle.</font> -> To use cel nav and use a map, you assume every celestial body is 6218 mi away => 6218 ≡ any distance in AU or light-years. No focal adjustment - we see them our personal azi domes as an equidistant web, just as the celestial sphere indicates for cel nav --- ![[Arago2 1.png]] Notes: **Arago’s Experiment**: - **Conflict**: The refraction of light from fixed stars should show variations with static ether, but results do not indicate such changes in relation to Earth's orbital velocity of 30 km/s **E. T. Whittaker**: > *<font color="#ff0000">Arago submitted the matter to the test of experiment, and concluded that the light coming from any star behaves in all cases of reflexion and refraction precisely as it would if the star were situated in the place which it appears to occupy in consequence of aberration, and the earth were at rest; so that the apparent refraction in a moving prism is equal to the absolute refraction in a fixed prism.</font>* François Arago, “Mémoire sur la vitesse de la lumière, lu à la prémière classe de l’Institut, le 10 décembre 1810. Académie des sciences (Paris). Comptes Rendus 36 (1853):38-49. --- ![[20241219-44.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241226-1.png]] Notes: - Double spirit level - Completely filled to the top w/ water - Micrometer diamond grid - 1 micrometer = 1 arcsecond on the celestial sphere *"Then the intervals of the wires in celestial arc are to be found by observing transits of the star across the wires, the instrument being placed in the position represented in figure 2. And by comparison of these two measures of intervals, the value of the scale of the micrometer will be found, in terms of celestial arc."* - Figure 7 is the fixed plate of the micrometer-box, with its system of crossed wires. - is the system of crossed wires on the fixed plate of the micrometer. ‘The actual number of crosses is 27; but only 25 are required. The breadth visible in the field of view of the eyepiece is so much limited that only a succession of simple crosses, X, X, X, is visible. --- ![[medfmes-ezgif.com-video-to-gif-converter.gif]] Notes: - Nautical mile = celestial sky miles - Standard/Empirical ratios of terrestrial meridians - Eratos story / Stadia (Relevant later) - This is why you can take an elevation angle to a star and follow a cosine as a ratio of its distance and altitude (arbitrarily) https://publish.obsidian.md/flatearth/Sky+Miles#Historical+use+in+the+definition+of+units+of+measurement Units of measurement --- ![[20241219-45.png]] Notes: Starlight never comes at your zeni Always a drift "Perfectly parallel light rays" <font color="#ff0000">x</font> The exact position's of the stars has no physical meaning. It's arbitrarily defined by the first cusp of Aries --- ![[zodiac_ae 1.png]] Notes: AE Projection of the zodiac https://publish.obsidian.md/shanesql/Cosmography --- ![[20241219-20.png]] Notes: https://publish.obsidian.md/shanesql/Sky+Miles#Astrogeodesic https://publish.obsidian.md/shanesql/Geodesic+Surveying%2C+Spherical+Excess --- ![[20241219-24.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-25.png]] Notes: - Measuring the timing a star completes a Meridian transit for two observers. - Statistical analysis and timing offset for accuracy https://publish.obsidian.md/shanesql/Geodesic+Surveying%2C+Spherical+excess --- ![[20241219-26.png]] Notes: 30" corrections --- ![[20241219-27.png]] Notes: Refraction = equivalent - Nothing can be determined with ground obs if all obs can be made equal - Determining factor has to be with respec to the stars - Gauss --- ![[20241219-28.png]] Notes: - 6" LMAO --- ![[20241210-14.png]] Notes: - Units of measurement --- ![[20241219-47.png]] --- ![[20241219-48.png]] --- ![[20241219-49.png]] --- Notes: RZA Masterpiece The effect of atmospheric refraction on reciprocal zenith angles is a complex phenomenon influenced by various atmospheric conditions, including temperature, pressure, and humidity. Here is a summary of the key measurements and findings related to this effect: Key Factors Influencing Refraction Vertical Temperature Gradient (VTG): The VTG is a major factor affecting the refractivity of zenith angles. It is challenging to measure directly due to its variability, but it can be modeled using mathematical approaches like least squares[1]. Atmospheric Pressure and Temperature: Changes in atmospheric pressure and temperature significantly impact the refraction coefficient and, consequently, the refracted zenith angle. The refraction effect tends to increase with higher pressure and lower temperatures[4]. Measurement Techniques Reciprocal Zenith Angles: This method involves measuring angles from two opposite directions to account for refraction effects. It has been used extensively to quantify refraction under various conditions[5]. Analytic Solutions: For space-based observations, analytic methods are used to calculate the true refracted zenith angle by considering the surface index of refraction and the spherical symmetry of the atmosphere[2]. debunking earth curve no. proving it never existed. other explanations for what must have been cuirvatue Effects of Refraction Variation with Height: The refraction effects are more pronounced near the Earth's surface, particularly within a few meters above it. As height increases, these effects become negligible[1][5]. Influence of Surface Type: Different surfaces, such as ice or vegetated ground, exhibit varying thermal properties that can amplify or reduce refraction effects[1]. Empirical Findings Studies have shown that refraction coefficients can vary significantly depending on environmental conditions. For instance, coefficients ranged from -4 to +16 over grassland at a height of 1.8 meters during sunny days[5]. Measurements over water or ice fields have demonstrated different ranges for refraction coefficients, indicating the influence of surface characteristics on atmospheric refraction[5]. --- ![[Pasted image 20241219175607.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-22.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-23.png]] Notes: - Transformation from celestial to ground measurement - Either the sky is curved or the ground is --- ![[20241219-30.png]] Notes: Schott, Charles Anthony. _Geodesy: The Transcontinental Triangulation and the American Arc of the Parallel_. 4. GOP, 1900. --- ![[20241219-31.png]] Notes: - Celestial coordinate corrections --- ![[20241219-32.png]] Notes: - Multiple spheroidal models and corrections --- ![[20241219-33.png]] Notes: - Cooked books --- ![[20241219-34.png]] Notes: Corrections (to the stars) --- ![[20241225-1.png]] --- ![[20241225-2.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-38.png]] Notes: - 1776 Royal Decree to use the mandated Lat/Long coordinate system (derived from the stars) - Mandatory use of the coordinate system - <font color="#ff0000">**AT NO POINT DID ANYONE MEASURE THE GROUND**</font> --- ![[20241219-35.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-36.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-37.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-39.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-41.png]] Notes: - Supplemental corrections book and how they derived the corrections made when checking zennies Great Britain. Nautical Almanac Office and United States Naval Observatory. Nautical Almanac Office. _Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Ephemeris and the American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac_. H.M. Stationery Office, 1961. --- # Summary of Direct Measurement Evidence --- Notes: Globular theory is built on incoming parallel light rays from an infinite distance that only have optical deviations due the physical curvature of the Earth. Meaning you're tilted away from the stars you're looking at in the distance. It's been shown by Arago and Airy that starlight comes in with a drift to it By following the laws of cosines (relating a distance to an angle of a triangle of 180°), zenith observations of the star are required to confirm the ground position. As noted by James Bradley (1728) on stellar aberration and by Airy's (1872) experiment on the affects of refraction of starlight in a zenith mounted telescope, it was experimentally confirmed that starlight already comes in at the same angle in water that it does in air. Thus the true position of a star idealized from the cosine calculations does not exist. Yet deviations from these calculations are used create a reference ellipsoid and the cause of the angles is attributed to the Earth being an oblate. To introduce even more precise corrections, a gravitational potential model is overlayed with the reference ellipsoid to make additional compensations to the zenith angles. Geodetic surveyors claim their plumb bob isn't truly vertical to the horizontal due to gravitational anomalies, which is why the star isn't its expected position. Then justifying the correction angles as a necessity to remain perpendicular to the gravitational potential of Earth. --- # Shadowsets Notes: Mutually exclusive; a physical effect of curvature is the shadows. This effect cannot be produced optically. Stone video and Taboo Mountain video --- ![[Space Audits - @tabooconspiracy Shadowsets ft Man Of Stone [pBplfd_SnZQ - 1835x1032 - 7m15s] 1.png]] Notes: Globular prediction: Physical curvature as you rotate away from the sun will cause the shadow to rise higher than the object casting the shadow (in this example, the window and the pillars) --- ![[Space Audits - @tabooconspiracy Shadowsets ft Man Of Stone [pBplfd_SnZQ - 1835x1032 - 7m26s].png]] Notes: Flat Earth prediction: As the local sun moves away (never going below the Earth) the shadow will rise nearly to the height of the object casting it, but never reach it. The shadow will slow down before reaching that peak and then remain stationary until it fades as the light turns to night. --- ![[Space Audits - @tabooconspiracy Shadowsets ft Man Of Stone [pBplfd_SnZQ - 1835x1032 - 7m50s].png]] Notes: Picture from Man of Stone's house --- ![[Space Audits - @tabooconspiracy Shadowsets ft Man Of Stone [pBplfd_SnZQ - 1835x1032 - 9m04s].png]] Notes: The shadow observed by Stone is physically impossible if the cause of a sunset (or sun rise) was Earth curvature and rotation. What's observed: The shadow rises almost to the height of the window, remained stationary and then faded out as the sun traveled farther away. Full video included below: --- <iframe height="800" width="800" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pBplfd_SnZQ?autoplay=0"> </iframe> Notes: Space Audits: https://youtu.be/pBplfd_SnZQ Man of Stone: https://www.bitchute.com/profile/8u8fKbrPbrE2 --- # Satellite orbits & Circumpolar Navigation Notes: Mutually exclusive --- # What a longitudinal circumpolar orbit should look like: Notes: --- ![[20241004-31.png]] --- ![[20241004-21.png]] --- ![[20241004-29.png]] --- # Actual longitudinal "circumpolar" orbits look like this: --- ![[20241004-18.png]] --- ![[20241004-26.png]] --- ![[20241004-17.png]] --- ![[20241004-24.png]] --- ![[20241004-19.png]] --- ![[20241004-25.png]] --- ![[20241004-16.png]] --- ![[20241004-22.png]] --- ![[20241004-15.png]] --- ![[20241004-23.png]] --- ![[20241004-14.png]] --- ![[20241004-27.png]] --- # Terrestrial Navigation: Circumpolar Routes --- ![[20241220-11.png]] --- ![[20241220-12.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-13.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-33.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-15.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-16.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-17.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-18.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-19.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-20.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-21.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-31.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-32.png]] Notes: --- ![[Untitleddesign3-ezgif.com-video-to-gif-converter_1.gif]] --- ![[20241220-25.png]] --- ![[20241220-26.png]] --- ![[20241220-27.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-28.png]] Notes: --- Undersea cables --- # Battle of the Beams Notes: Mutually exclusive physical barrier vs no barrier Summary: --- ![[20241219-11.png]] Notes: - Top down view --- ![[20241220-30.png]] Notes: - Orthographic view --- ![[20241219-13.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-14.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-15.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-16.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-17.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241219-18.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-8.png]] Notes: --- ![[20240903-19.png]] Notes: Giving maximum benefit to the globe. We put the observer height for both towers at 656ft above sea level. Since know the first transmission before the first bombing attempt on Derby in June was picked up @ Spalding with an equisignal of 400-500 yards, we can make out the exact amount of beam divergence and/or diffraction caused by Earth curvature. Additionally, we know the altitude of the bombers. From that we can determine, based on the dimensions of the beam width over Spalding, and show outward projections for other targets --- ![[20240830-3.png]] Notes: Kleve -> Spalding -> Derby Max beam width over Derby (based on measured beam divergence over Spalding) = ~676 yds @ 334 mi distance @ 745 mi ~1400 yards [less than a mi] Theoretical max width based on 0.3° divergence: 3075 yards ( 1.75 mi wid beam) --- ![[20240903-20.png]] Notes: Stollberg -> Beeston -> Derby Max beam width over Derby (based on measured beam divergence over Spalding) = ~### yds @ 451 mi distance - Calculated beam width based on measured divergence of Kleve beam; 914 yard Theoretical max width based on 0.3° divergence: 4157 yards (2.36 mi wide beam) --- ![[20240830-4.png]] Notes: - FE Explanation - It just works - using plane trig angle of the ground transmitter to airplane altitude over target --- ![[20240914-5.png]] Notes: https://chatgpt.com/share/66e60e49-1bb8-800d-8bee-b1ca16c0a352 --- ![[20240916-1.png]] Notes: Conditions between Ground to Target Ground (656ft) to Target (bomber @ 13k to 19k ft) Line of sight. No skipping, no bouncing, no refracting. --- Telefunken Test: Stollberg to 1000 km away, 4000m height ![[20240914-13.png]] --- Kleve to Spalding, 6000m height ![[20240914-14.png]] --- Kleve to Derby, 6000m height ![[20240914-15.png]] --- Stollberg to Derby, 6000m height ![[20240914-16.png]] --- ![[20241228-1.png]] Notes: --- # Selenelion Eclipses --- ![[20241220-9.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-10.png]] Notes: - Some toppies, some bottomies - No prediction for which - Casual mechanism: Unknown --- Add new ones from Pieo --- Cone Bundt cake cosmology Possible to predict the top down or bottom up based on the asc and desc of the sun and moon. --- # 24h Sun Antarctica --- ![[20250109-2.png]] Notes: Sunrise https://adl.place/shanes-fe-model&state=--6~53.826566-1~67.515485-11.9487171-13.3486378-173.486772-282.929548-11-9-6 --- ![[Pasted image 20250109231135.png]] Notes Local solar noon Personal dome vs physical position prediction Zigzags vs antiarc Physic object vs localized to the observer Antiarc vs zigzag Dec. angle = true (always) Right Asc. = false (true at solar noon only) Right Asc. = false creates circles for E and W Magnetic declination maintains the "true" East and West position from the deviation in the apparent as see by the observer as function of our dome optics. Magnetic decs = Optics connections? https://adl.place/shanes-fe-model&state=--6~53.826566-1~67.515485-11.9487171-13.3486378-173.486772-282.929548-11-9-6 --- ![[20250109-1.png]] Notes: Sunset https://adl.place/shanes-fe-model&state=--6~53.826566-1~67.515485-11.9487171-13.3486378-173.486772-282.929548-11-9-6 --- ![[20250109-4.png]] Notes: Visual dome not to scale ;; Scale and Symmetry have no relation to the ground below it / Perception of the sky would look identical (in terms of length) to the north --- Notes: Elevation azi angles, etc azi and elevation drive the model and they match FE angles this observation above the horizon cannot be used falsify the null hypothesis. A prediction of a local sun No kinematic (observational) change req. Dynammie change req. (meaning the physical explanation mechanistically) - Curved visual space, you would expect it to be in front of you and set, but at the outer limit of the field - Mechanism: Optical, toroidal field geometry, dome geometry (Hanvey, Kat). - Without substantiation of physical earth curvature that's independent of celestial bodies, the globular model cannot explain a 24h Antarctic sun - Cosmological speculation All or nothing fallacy Hasty generalization Affirming the consequent --- ![[20241221-6.png]] Notes: Apparent sun --- ![[20241221-7.png]] --- ![[20241221-8.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241221-9.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241221-2.png]] --- ![[20241221-3.png]] --- ![[20241221-4.png]] --- ![[20241221-5.png]] --- ![[20241220-2.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-1.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-4.png]] --- ![[20241220-6.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-3.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241226-2.png]] Notes: Gulbekian, Edward. “The Origin and Value of the Stadion Unit Used by Eratosthenes in the Third Century B.C.” _Archive for History of Exact Sciences_ 37, no. 4 (December 1987): 359–63. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417008](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417008). --- ![[20241220-5.png]] Notes: --- # Rainbows --- Place holder Notes: - Takes the shape of the object that polarized the light - Light has to come from outside of that object to be polarized - We're looking at objects in the sky through a physical medium --- ![[20241220-37.png]] Notes: --- # Southern Star Trails Counter-Rotation --- ![[20241220-35.png]] Notes: Bottom up --- Notes: Top down --- <iframe height="720" width="1280" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JZT3Q4u-G0w?autoplay=0"> </iframe> Notes: --- # How would I explain a 24h in Antarctica? --- 7 ![[20250110-1.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241220-38.png]] Notes: --- ![[20241221-1.png]] Notes: --- Summary: FECore simulated sun for observers at every latitude on Earth and it makes an apparent toroid Sun/Moon beams over water Nobody is looking at the real sun in the north, south, or even at the equator. ALWAYS apparent Merger of the two hemispheres completes the globe Curvature and coming up the other side is equivalent to seeing the sun ant,Iiarc around you and turning to the north There is nothing beyond the ice wall in my cosmology --- Notes: Contentions: Hanvey Reflective Dome Model Reflective dome puts the apparent GP outside of the Tropic of Cancer and Capricorn Non-analogous light distro Sunspot flip and intervert rather than just flip. ( NEW INFO STONE) We're not looking at a reflection or a separate sun, it's always apparent and localized to us --- Notes: Mord's mechanical gyro argument --- Pendulums Notes: Kinematties and dynammies --- Notes: Kinematties vs Dynammies analysis and prediction --- iframe https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=126ffa57z3-HVw7s_EIHGbF_sPmnFVNo&hl=en&ll=4.531704679986745%2C-161.56004394023876&z=3 Notes: Moon --- iframe https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=192DX7ppQ_iFCyWNfO3Hrn8dN-BdNI-8&hl=en&ll=26.985042685674273%2C-60.928676716208145&z=3 Notes: --- ---