### Dimensional Analysis (DA) — Summary <!-- element align="left" -->
- DA is a powerful method used in science and engineering to simplify physical problems by analyzing the dimensions (units) of the variables involved. <!-- element align="left" -->
- Key theorems such as Bridgman's theorem ensure dimensional homogeneity in equations, while the Buckingham $\pi$ theorem allows the systematic construction of independent dimensionless parameters that capture the essence of the physical system.<!-- element align="left" -->
---
### DA - Uses <!-- element align="left" -->
It helps to:<!-- element align="left" -->
- Check the consistency and plausibility of equations.
- Reduce the number of variables in a problem by forming dimensionless groups. <!-- element align="left" -->
- Reveal fundamental relationships between physical quantities.
- Guide experimental design and data analysis by identifying key dimensionless parameters.<!-- element align="left" -->
---
#### DA - Bridgman Theorem <!-- element align="left" -->
- States that any physically meaningful equation involving physical quantities must be dimensionally homogeneous; that is, all additive terms in the equation must have the same dimensions. <!-- element align="left" -->
- This principle allows us to check the plausibility of equations and to derive relationships between variables by ensuring dimensional consistency. <!-- element align="left" -->
---
#### DA - Buckingham theorem<!-- element align="left" -->
- States that if a physical problem involves $n$ variables and $k$ fundamental dimensions (such as mass, length, time), the variables can be grouped into $n - k$ independent dimensionless parameters, called $\pi$ terms. These $\pi$ terms capture the essential relationships among the variables and simplify the analysis of physical systems by reducing the number of variables.<!-- element align="left" -->
---
#### The Mystery Data Set - Set Up<!-- element align="left" -->
- The mystery data found on canvas, [shortLeaf.txt](https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/56zl5llye1otmeoba2wy8/shortLeaf.txt?rlkey=g472utsbrn4hdg4lzz1lgt684&dl=0), is the volume and diameter data associated with 70 [shortleaf pines](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinus_echinata), reported on by C. Bruce and F. X. Schumacher in a 1935 book titled, "[Forest Mensuration](https://books.google.com/books/about/Forest_Mensuration.html?id=ISTxAAAAMAAJ)". <!-- element align="left" -->
- With these data, you are asked to define a linear model relating the two variables. <!-- element align="left" -->
---
#### The Mystery Data Set - Ideas and Results<!-- element align="left" -->
- You should see that while the linear model has a high coefficient of determination, i.e., $R^2=0.8926$, both the scatter plot and residuals suggest that a nonlinear fit would be more appropriate. At this point, we could transform, ([Box-Cox](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_transform#Box%E2%80%93Cox_transformation), [log transform](https://medium.com/@kyawsawhtoon/log-transformation-purpose-and-interpretation-9444b4b049c9)), the data to understand an underlying nonlinear relationship, but we could also inform this process through the use of dimensional analysis. <!-- element align="left" -->
---
- Plot of linear fit of volume-diameter data<!-- element align="left" -->
![[VD_LM.png]]
---
- Plot of its residuals<!-- element align="left" -->
![[VD_LM_Res.png]]
---
#### Continued Work<!-- element align="left" -->
This data is further analyzed in the <!-- element align="left" -->
- [Continued work from Penn Stat course on applied regression analysis](https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat462/node/154/)<!-- element align="left" -->
---
#### The Complete Data Set<!-- element align="left" -->
- Having also found the complete data set, [shortleaf_pine_data.csv](https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/4wh2k8m3bz3ji3fd77h9j/shortleaf_pine_data.csv?rlkey=mz43hmkuunq3il9u0r76qcdlu&dl=0) , we have the linear model with standard errors of estimates in subscripts, which indicates that $h$ is not a significant predictor, and a plot of its residuals further suggests that a nonlinear fit would be reasonable to explore in this more general case.<!-- element align="left" -->
$\hat{v} = -43.0513_{(5.1535)} + 6.6625_{(0.5087)} × d + 0.0443_{(0.1166)} h$
---
#### Residuals of the linear model<!-- element align="left" -->
![[LMResiduals.png]]
---
#### Results of dimensional analysis <!-- element align="left" -->
![[DimAnalysisPlot.png]]
---
#### Results of dimensional analysis <!-- element align="left" -->
![[DimAnalysisPlot_Residuals.png]]