Two critical scholars who made a Greek language version of the New Testament based on some of the oldest manuscripts which disputes some of the readings of the later manuscripts known as the _Alexandrian_ family. They favored the [[Codex Vaticanus]] and [[Codex Sinaiticus]]. [Westcott and Hort](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westcott_and_Hort) > Westcott and Hort state: "[It is] our belief that even among the numerous unquestionably spurious readings of the New Testament there are no signs of deliberate falsification of the text for dogmatic purposes."[[3]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westcott_and_Hort#cite_note-FOOTNOTEWestcottHort1896282-3) They find that without orthographic differences, doubtful textual variants exist only in one sixtieth of the whole New Testament (with most of them being comparatively trivial variations), with the substantial variations forming hardly more than one thousandth of the entire text.[[4]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westcott_and_Hort#cite_note-FOOTNOTEWestcottHort18962-4)